RE: ☢The Theistic Response➼ to Atheists saying, "It Doesn't mean God Did it"
November 24, 2016 at 4:54 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2016 at 4:54 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(November 24, 2016 at 2:14 pm)The Joker Wrote: Science has its limits. You can't use a telescope to prove God or get God under a microscope for examination. There are many things science can't prove, Science cannot prove that your spouse loves you, Science is the only way to really know truth.” How could you prove that statement by science? Science cannot prove that rape is evil. Atheists, you won't find God that way.
(November 24, 2016 at 11:44 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Just more examples of trying to talk God into existence. Funny how God is the only concept that gets this special treatment. No one posts reams of text trying to convince us that trees or ducks are real, and for good reason - with a bit of looking, we can find a tree or a duck. Furthermore, no one of even moderate intelligence looks at our find and argues that it is not a tree or a duck. Everyone agrees on the definitions of 'tree' and 'duck'.
None of this can be said for the God concept. 'Proofs' for the existence of God rely on the specific 'prover' defining God (definitions which have frequently been problematic enough to start wars), and then using less-than-impressive rhetoric to sort of back into the definition.
Colour me unconvinced.
Boru
You forgot God is invisible, unlike a tree or a duck.
Sez you.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax