(December 3, 2016 at 11:47 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(December 3, 2016 at 8:18 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Here's WLC getting embarassed some more:
I think Craig is on point here. His opponent is drawing value judgements about harming others out of thin air, without really justifying why they are moral values. He's engaged in a classic example of Moore's naturalistic fallacy. So ultimately, I think the point goes to Craig.
“If everything on earth were rational, nothing would happen.”
― Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Nah that's conflating moral ontology with moral epistemology.