William Lane Craig unmasked.

[bennyboy]

Here's WLC getting embarassed some more:

I think Craig is on point here.  His opponent is drawing value judgements about harming others out of thin air, without really justifying why they are moral values.  He's engaged in a classic example of Moore's naturalistic fallacy.  So ultimately, I think the point goes to Craig.


“If everything on earth were rational, nothing would happen.”
― Fyodor Dostoyevsky

Yep.  So far, every time someone's posted how WLC has been "embarrassed," it's because they are excited about an atheist's points, and ignoring WLC's.  I think he holds the wrong position, but nobody can really accuse him of not representing that position pretty much as well as one could, IMO.