William Lane Craig unmasked.

[Angrboda]

I think Craig is on point here.  His opponent is drawing value judgements about harming others out of thin air, without really justifying why they are moral values.  He's engaged in a classic example of Moore's naturalistic fallacy.  So ultimately, I think the point goes to Craig.


“If everything on earth were rational, nothing would happen.”
― Fyodor Dostoyevsky

Nah that's conflating moral ontology with moral epistemology.

Could you explain further? It seems to me that this is what Shelly is doing.