RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander.
December 24, 2016 at 5:47 am
(This post was last modified: December 24, 2016 at 5:48 am by Jehanne.)
It is interesting and incredible that an academic like Dr. Salviander would align herself with someone like Dr. Craig, who quotes the BGV Theorem ad nauseam, yet he says (see the above YouTube link) that "infinity minus infinity is undefined" (it's not, Dr. Craig, it's indeterminate), rejecting proofs (like the BGV Theorem, except, without the assumptions of that theorem) that prove, absolutely, that there are "infinities within infinities":
https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...ent-sizes/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity#Infinity_symbol
This should prove, once and for all, that Craig is a lying dope; it is incredible that a published PhD astrophysicist could be duped by him.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...ent-sizes/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity#Infinity_symbol
This should prove, once and for all, that Craig is a lying dope; it is incredible that a published PhD astrophysicist could be duped by him.