Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 21, 2025, 4:08 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The curious case of Sarah Salviander.
#15
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander.
(December 26, 2016 at 6:37 pm)operator Wrote: I think even highly intelligent people are susceptible to believing in certain things if they allow themselves to be convinced to think of certain things in a certain way. Even the most hard nosed skeptic, if following a false line of evidence or false line of thinking that they believe to be true, can end up believing in a complete falsehood.

Especially if someone allows another person to convince them to think of something the way they think of it... If it's like one person in your life constantly trying to get you to see something a certain way and you kind of want to see their point it can be easy to be deceived.

It is very interesting but I think the explanation is simpler than some might assume.

If you read her website some more, she says that she was heavily influenced by Dr. Gerald Schroeder, a PhD graduate in physics from MIT (whom Professor Antony Flew was also heavily influenced by).  In one of his books (The Science of God...), Dr. Schroeder says that kinetic energy is proportional to an object's velocity and also equivocates mass with weight:

https://pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/11...-with.html

For any individual with any degree in physics (even an AS) to make the above claim that kinetic energy is proportional to an object's velocity is beyond absurd.

(December 26, 2016 at 7:18 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Why is it a curious case for an attractive, intelligent, successful person to be a theist? I know plenty of them.

I don't see why it's so hard to fathom that someone else may believe differently than yourself without being dumb and ugly lol.

She's not ugly, far from it.  There's nothing wrong with her physical appearance.  As far as her clothing goes, she was wearing a long feminine blouse with a long feminine skirt, completely in line with her conservative religious views.  Also, considering the fact that she lives in Texas (a conservative state, both politically and religiously), her appearance would be typical of many women in that state, the majority of whom do not wear pants to work, church, etc.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Jehanne - December 23, 2016 at 4:28 pm
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by AkiraTheViking - December 23, 2016 at 11:09 pm
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by robvalue - December 24, 2016 at 2:49 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Jehanne - December 24, 2016 at 5:47 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Edwardo Piet - December 24, 2016 at 7:33 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Jehanne - December 24, 2016 at 7:49 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Edwardo Piet - December 24, 2016 at 7:51 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Jehanne - December 24, 2016 at 9:27 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Edwardo Piet - December 24, 2016 at 9:33 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Jehanne - December 24, 2016 at 9:40 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Anomalocaris - December 24, 2016 at 10:28 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Lek - December 26, 2016 at 6:01 pm
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Anomalocaris - December 26, 2016 at 8:14 pm
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by AceBoogie - December 26, 2016 at 6:37 pm
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Jehanne - December 26, 2016 at 7:30 pm
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Catholic_Lady - December 26, 2016 at 7:18 pm
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by robvalue - December 27, 2016 at 4:32 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by chimp3 - December 27, 2016 at 7:53 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by RoadRunner79 - December 27, 2016 at 10:09 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Catholic_Lady - December 27, 2016 at 10:56 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by RoadRunner79 - December 27, 2016 at 11:06 am
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Jehanne - December 27, 2016 at 12:03 pm
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by RoadRunner79 - December 27, 2016 at 1:04 pm
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by Jehanne - December 27, 2016 at 4:12 pm
RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander. - by brewer - December 27, 2016 at 11:59 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A Case for Inherent Morality JohnJubinsky 66 13388 June 22, 2021 at 10:35 am
Last Post: John 6IX Breezy
  Cold-Case Christianity LadyForCamus 32 8052 May 24, 2019 at 7:52 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Atheism: The Case Against God by George H. Smith Alexmahone 10 3091 March 4, 2018 at 6:52 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Curious to know Little Rik 249 42701 July 3, 2016 at 6:13 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Curious about sneezing lol mlmooney89 29 6904 June 23, 2016 at 9:59 pm
Last Post: dom.donald
  The Case for Atheism Drew_2013 410 248666 March 17, 2016 at 12:46 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Curious question of curiosity. Spooky 44 8954 November 14, 2015 at 5:38 pm
Last Post: Spooky
  Case closed on making cases against the case for stuff, in case you were wondering. Whateverist 27 8113 December 11, 2014 at 8:12 am
Last Post: robvalue
  the case against the case against god chris(tnt)rhol 92 23134 December 10, 2014 at 4:19 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  Overstating the case for Athiesm. rsb 87 30702 March 16, 2014 at 4:28 am
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)