The curious case of Sarah Salviander.

[RoadRunner79]

Why are you so surprised?   You might pontificate, that there are more stories out there like this, then you may be aware of.

Also, just for consideration, but the message you sent may come off as trolling....  You are not really asking a question or making any argument against anything that what said in the context of the site or their position, but bringing up something unrelated about another.  (not to mention, that I think that the clip and argument about Craig, are lacking in the principle of charity, to understand what he is actually putting forth).

I did ask a question (which is appropriate to the "Atheism" subforum of this board, namely, "If you want to discuss atheism in general, this forum is the place to be!"), which is, " What's going on with these people?"

Yes, and as I said, I wasn't discussing here, but rather your message you sent.

---

Just to clarify, that part was just directed to the message sent to "SixDay Science", and why a reply wasn't received.

I didn't really expect a reply.  If you look further on their website, all correspondence is theirs to do with as they please (i.e., "publish angry diatribes from atheists," etc.)  I would certainly welcome a reply, namely, one along the lines of why a professional astrophysicist would link to a man such as WLC, who called the number zero "very problematic".

This was the part, that I think could be viewed as trolling.  There was a thread on this, but it is old now.  If you like, I would be willing to look at the supposed problem you think you see in Craig's quote.  Frankly, I have a feeling, that the problem is being overly dramatized, and taken out of context (at least for what I looked at the clip), but I'm willing to take a look.