RE: The curious case of Sarah Salviander.
December 27, 2016 at 4:12 pm
(This post was last modified: December 27, 2016 at 4:12 pm by Jehanne.)
(December 27, 2016 at 1:04 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(December 27, 2016 at 12:03 pm)Jehanne Wrote: I did ask a question (which is appropriate to the "Atheism" subforum of this board, namely, "If you want to discuss atheism in general, this forum is the place to be!"), which is, " What's going on with these people?"
Yes, and as I said, I wasn't discussing here, but rather your message you sent.
Quote:I didn't really expect a reply. If you look further on their website, all correspondence is theirs to do with as they please (i.e., "publish angry diatribes from atheists," etc.) I would certainly welcome a reply, namely, one along the lines of why a professional astrophysicist would link to a man such as WLC, who called the number zero "very problematic".
This was the part, that I think could be viewed as trolling. There was a thread on this, but it is old now. If you like, I would be willing to look at the supposed problem you think you see in Craig's quote. Frankly, I have a feeling, that the problem is being overly dramatized, and taken out of context (at least for what I looked at the clip), but I'm willing to take a look.
Then look:
Go to the 1:17:00 mark.