new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked")

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

He's having us on. I don't believe any of this.

I guess he wins there...?

I can hold this belief without needing to be certain that any elements involved here are "real" or that the cause and effect chain is beyond question. It just works, that's all I need to know about it. As long as it works, I'll use it.

Do you hold anything to be TRUE/ABSOLUTE [believe]?

Short answer: no.

Humans do things at best, in a probabilistic manner. (We only occupy distinct slices of time, of MANY SLICES, so we don't do ABSOLUTE/TOTAL actions)

Albeit, although we do things probabilistically, absent belief, attempting to believe/regard things as true/absolute likely induces that one select sub-optimal probabilities.
.
.
.
.
.
..

---

But dude.. he said he doesn't consider anything true he only considers things scientifically true.

Pffft. What are you gonna tell me next? That scientifically true is still true? Gimme a break dude! The guy SAID that he holds nothing to be true. He only holds things SCIENTIFICALLY true and beliefs are ESPECIALLY without proof.

Next you'll be teling me that "especially" doesn't mean "always"!!!



I mean, the guy asked us to join a cult.  Are you suggesting that he doesn't realize he's using the wrong words?

Silly suggestion indeed.


NOTE: Non-beliefism is empirically accurate. (You need only observe empirical data, whence such is not merely "say of mine")

See responses above. [AlisdairHam & Alex K & robvalue]