new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked")

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Yes, so, as I said, it's the same position with different definitions. You are using one definition only, and I may say, religiously. You're ignoring the second definition, even in your own screenshot, plus other well known informal ones that people regularly use.

I'm going to give up now.

(1)

Ironically, it seems you didn't observe said alternate definitions.
Universally, said definitions compound on 'truth'/ABSOLUTENESS/TOTALITY.
Ergo, articles/analysis sequences of mine comprise on said universal distribution, of large frequency. 

Albeit:



.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

(2)
★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

By extension, recall that one's belief may compound on NON-SCIENCE/NONSENSE.
Logic/science in contrast, compounds not, on NON-SCIENCE.

And thus, it is illogical to attempt belief.

By extension, whether or not one believes in gravity for example, is irrelevant, as gravity holds regardless of belief.

Therein, we observe belief's redundancy.

.
.
.

POST SCRIPTUM:
I had long mentioned the aforementioned, amidst the linked articles.