RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked&qu...
December 30, 2016 at 2:16 pm
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2016 at 2:22 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(December 30, 2016 at 2:09 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(December 30, 2016 at 1:52 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: In exemplification, prove the presence of a single non-scientific sequence amidst the stipulation of that of the being you presume to express nonsense.
Say wha?
(1)
I had edited my prior stipulation, via user 'Jörmungandr'.
PRIOR: In exemplification, prove the presence....
SUBSEQUENT: In exemplification, prove scientifically, the presence ....
.
.
.
.
.
(2)
Indeed.
It is pertinent that you garner scientific proof, regarding the presence of a single non-scientific sequence amidst the stipulation of that of the being you presume to express nonsense.
.
Separately, what is your native language?
It appears that you are unable to parse simplistic strings of English .