RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked&qu...
December 30, 2016 at 2:58 pm
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2016 at 3:15 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(December 30, 2016 at 2:36 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote:(December 29, 2016 at 5:25 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Do you hold anything to be TRUE/ABSOLUTE [believe]?
Holding something to be true or believing it is not the same thing as holding something to be true or believing it with absolute certainty.
Frequent belief definition: To accept as TRUE.
At best, one regards events as LIKELY/SCIENTIFICALLY TRUE, rather than TRUE.
.
.
.
.
.
(December 30, 2016 at 2:41 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(December 30, 2016 at 1:50 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: It's like reading pretentious robo-shakespeare.
Even the most basic AI chatbot would Kirk itself rather than butcher Elizabethan grammar like that.
AI chat-bots display not any sentience.