RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked&qu...
December 30, 2016 at 11:42 pm
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2016 at 11:58 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(December 30, 2016 at 11:05 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(December 29, 2016 at 9:36 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Incorrect.
We at best, regard as LIKELY/scientifically true, rather than absolute/true.
Belief is to accept as TRUE/ABSOLUTE.
Thusly, belief exists not.
So, there but exists solely non-belief. (rather than belief and non-belief)
Sounds like a load of cherry picking definitions and playing semantics games to me.
Do you believe you and your fellow cult members are getting it right?
(1)
I have not any belief. Such is for idiots/theists.
I had but utilized very initial google bound, definition sequences.
By extension, descriptions abound 38 separate definition websites were utilized.
Intersecting properties are thereafter compounded.
.
.
.
.
.
(2)
Separately, belief may constitute non-science.
Logic/science in contrast, shan't encode non-science.
Thereafter, it is illogical to believe.