(January 3, 2017 at 10:23 am)Godschild Wrote:(January 3, 2017 at 10:03 am)Astonished Wrote: Totally, utterly laughable. Projecting your own failures onto others, typical. While you try to explain why 2+2=5, our attempts to correct you are being ignored and called into question when it's your phony god's obvious imperfect human nature shining through and embarrassing you both. I'm sorry if your lack of reading comprehension is this severe but that'll happen when you only ever read one book. Called circular logic, maybe try stepping off that track, you might learn something worthwhile.
The laughable thing in all this nonsense you allow to seep out of your mind, thoughtless trash. I've asked you a question and you refuse to answer it and why, because you can't, you haven't the biblical knowledge to accomplish such an easy task. If you want to have a biblical discussion with me study the Bible and answer the question. Don't tell me I don't know scripture and that you do because you've not shown oneproof.of knowledge or proof. I've had all this trash you are spouting thrown at me many times and yet none have proven such dribble.
GC
I provided a passage in the bible (just one of many) that prove you wrong and you gave the most convoluted non-sequitur of a response to it. If you're going to be that incoherent, you don't deserve being humored with any kind of answers, and you wouldn't accept them anyway. Being closed-minded will tend to do that to you. Your refusal to see the bible for what it really is when it's pointed out to you clearly and distinctly is not a failure on my part, but on yours. And again, projection, you're the one spouting thoughtless trash. Seriously, get a mirror so you can aim your projections at the real target.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.