RE: ★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)
January 10, 2017 at 9:26 pm
(This post was last modified: January 10, 2017 at 9:45 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
@Asmodee
It appears you have failed to reduce the initial passage.
International belief definition:
To accept as TRUE/ABSOLUTE.
Simply, we aren't omniscient of any event, thusly we can't regard any event as TRUE/TOTAL/ABSOLUTE.
@Ben
In the like, it appears you have failed to reduce the initial passage.
Simply, the target thing, shan't be measurable as 'true', due to the instance that humans (as far as science regards) cannot measure any scenario with absolute accuracy.
That is, we don't have access to 'truth' / absoluteness.
By extension, you fail to oppose non-beliefism's subsequent premise:
(January 10, 2017 at 2:28 pm)Asmodee Wrote: The OP is nonsense. That the universe is inherently filled with uncertainty does not make it impossible for people to believe otherwise.
It appears you have failed to reduce the initial passage.
International belief definition:
To accept as TRUE/ABSOLUTE.
Simply, we aren't omniscient of any event, thusly we can't regard any event as TRUE/TOTAL/ABSOLUTE.
@Ben
(January 10, 2017 at 8:06 am)Ben Davis Wrote:
/thread time. Anyone can accept anything as true (and often do!). The accepted thing doesn't even have to be real. Since it's a demonstrable fact that people accept things to be true, belief exists and your proposition can not stand. The rest of your post is ad-hoc rationalisation to cover your equivocation fallacy.
In the like, it appears you have failed to reduce the initial passage.
Simply, the target thing, shan't be measurable as 'true', due to the instance that humans (as far as science regards) cannot measure any scenario with absolute accuracy.
That is, we don't have access to 'truth' / absoluteness.
By extension, you fail to oppose non-beliefism's subsequent premise: