(January 12, 2017 at 4:41 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(January 12, 2017 at 4:18 pm)Yadayadayada Wrote: "Argument from personal incredulity" is itself a weak argument, since incredulity is perfectly acceptable if warranted.
How so? Even if God started creation then ceased to have any measurable effect on reality, would not the existence of creation itself still testify to the fact of it being created by God?
No. "The fact that reality exists" is not evidence of a god. In that line of thinking, literally everything that exists is evidence of its creator, which is the largest tautology possible. It also makes your OP question rather useless, since you already consider everything to be evidence of a god.
What I consider to be evidence of God has no bearing whatsoever on my question.
Once again, this thread is not about me. It's about you. I'm asking you what you think.
