(January 12, 2017 at 3:33 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:(January 12, 2017 at 1:59 pm)21stCenturyIconoclast Wrote: m
Damn it! I thought this forum had the option of doing this.
No, its not about egos, like the "sideline nibblers" posting their irrelative tripe that has absolutely nothing to do
with the topic at hand, other than to make themselves fools as they childishly rant about the messenger instead of the message,
where the males of this group perceive that their male anatomy has grown, and for the females, their "breastesess" get bigger.
Their needs to be an audience because it forces the debaters to be on their best game, and its also a learning process for others
to glean even the slightest of entities from a debate for future use when dealing with the inept pseudo-christians like Drich represents.
As an example, I've learned from watching the great and late New Atheist Christopher Hitchens, where no Atheist will ever come close
to emulating, where he treated the primitive faith of Christianity with ridicule, hatred and contempt, and where he fought against the wickedness
and stupidity of this pagan faith at every turn (his exact words).
Okay, now its time for the children to chime in as "sideline nibblers." Who wants to be first? How about "mh.brewer" who touts
that he doesn't need to see this crap, but still reads it nonetheless where he has the option of not reading it, and subsequently, childishly
comments upon it anyway? LOL! I know, FatAndFaithless is always good for an irrelative comment to the topic at hand, maybe
he can be first? Wait, Catholic Lady is always good for a nondescript "runaway" comment to her embarrassing division of Christianity, maybe
this biblically second class women will be first?!
Kids, ya gotta love em!
m
21's bold's removed, my bold's added (how ya like me now?)
Nice try. It's all about your ego, the attention you will get, self fulfilling actions of grandeur. You get to "teach" us, oh goody! And we know it hurts your wittle feelers when we don't jump on your wagon touting that you're absolutely right, original and the best. And when you don't get the accolades you think you deserve from us you'll just rationalize it away with something like "I not surprised they can't see how great I am as they are just children compared to me".
And I get to poke (nibble) at bullshit when I see it. Your limited patterns of argument, thinking and ego are the most glaring. It's the same old shit over and over and over. Don't like the poke, change, shut up or get the fuck out. What a whiny bitch.
How do you like my irrelative tripe?
mh.brewer,
Damn it, albeit that you were upset by not being the first "sideline nibbler" to respond with IRRELATIVE tripe, huh?
If you're going to be the forums Grammar Nazi, by all means, correct Drich's terrible misspellings! LOL
Do the simple math, if you can, that one can glean from the slightest amounts of any debate, even Drich's statements as well.
I can see that you're upset with the fact that you could no more debate a pseudo-christian than a flattened crow on a Texas backroad could!
Its quite obvious, therefore, accept your limitations, and move on.
Yeah, I am responsible for the alleged same old shit when it comes to discussing pseudo-christianity, in the same vein, as a
neurologist discussing different concepts of brain surgery. Sorry, it comes with the territory.
Tell me, is this all you can do in this forum, is to chastise another in a circular reasoning way?
DO YOU EVER ENTER A DISCUSSION ADDRESSING THE TOPIC AT HAND, DO YOU? IF SO, GIVE ME AT LEAST 5
THREADS OF YOU ALLEGEDLY ENGAGING IN THIS MANNER, IF YOU CAN'T, THEN TO SAVE FURTHER
EMBARRASSMENT IN YOUR BEHALF, SHHHHHHHHHHHH.
B
