RE: ★★ [4.3 SECOND conversion] ★★: CONVERT religious to atheist, in roughly 4.3 seconds.
January 18, 2017 at 1:39 pm
(January 18, 2017 at 3:29 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Non omniscience = probabilistic expression, as far as science goes.
In other words, there doesn't appear to be any scope, beyond omniscience, or probabilistic expression, so if you aren't omniscient, you do things probabilistically...
The first statement just isn't true.
Science has nothing to say about omniscience or the lack thereof. Omniscience isn't a scientific idea, or an observable phenomena.
Science does have something to say about observations.
Nothing about your second sentence makes any sense. It's neither a proof nor an appeal to evidence of any kind.
I'm still stuck though. Did you wrap up your first philosophy 101 class last semester, or are you just trolling?