RE: What Do You Think?
January 20, 2017 at 1:20 am
(This post was last modified: January 20, 2017 at 1:26 am by JROHAN.)
(January 20, 2017 at 1:17 am)Alex K Wrote:(January 20, 2017 at 1:11 am)JROHAN Wrote: YOU WROTE:
Since it's not my belief that gravity is the result of random chance, I don't need evidence to the effect that it is. Understand?
Meh, like I said, if you ask me what gravity is the result of, I'll tell you the curvature of spacetime due to the uneven distribution of mass.
MY RESPONSE:
And that "curvature" happens by random chance or by intelligent design?
If the curvature of spacetime due to the uneven distribution of mass
is not intelligently designed then it must be the result of random chance, no?
What other option is there?
It could be caused by your density...
I'm really here to test this strategy that I feel was given to me by the intelligent designer
to believe the curvature of spacetime due to the uneven distribution of mass
does not happen by random chance nor by intelligent design...well....
WHAT ELSE IS THERE??
YOU WROTE:
The scientific evidence to back up my own description of gravity? Again, newtons laws and the theory of relativity, and ofc there's the tiny issue of the many experiments which suggest that einstein was right about gravity, describing it as I have described it to you. Other than that, I've got nothing.........lol?
MY RESPONSE:
YOU CAN'T USE THE THEORIES OF A PERSON WHO BELIEVED IN AN INTELLIGENTLY DESIGNED UNIVERSE
TO BACK YOUR STANCE BECAUSE YOU OPENLY DO NOT BELIEVE IN INTELLIGENT DESIGN, GET IT?
SHEESH!!!!
SO, THAT MEANS...
YOU'VE GOT NOTHING!!!!