(January 20, 2017 at 2:49 pm)JROHAN Wrote:(January 20, 2017 at 2:32 pm)JROHAN Wrote: MAN EVOLVING FROM SOME MYTHOLOGICAL APELIKE COMMON ANCESTOR
DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MEAN NO INTELLIGENT DESIGNER WAS INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS
IT MEANS there may indeed have been an intelligent designer involved in the process
Such theoretical speculations, on the part of atheists, are not necessarily correct!!!
THAT'S WHAT IT MEANS!!!
bold/unbold mine
What do you mean by "may [edit] have been". Is it also probable that there may not have been?
What do you mean by "not necessarily correct"? Is it also probable that they are correct?
Your opinion here has been found to be lacking and without merit. You have nothing more.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
