(January 22, 2017 at 8:53 pm)Aroura Wrote:(January 22, 2017 at 6:34 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: I spoke out of my ass.Yes.
Now, is saying that is was the largest attending inugeration actually demonstrably incorrect at this point?
(January 22, 2017 at 7:04 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: I haven't excused anything. I admitted that it wasn't an offhand comment. You're delusional as usual.
I know there are these picture comparisons. However from what I understand trump and the gang are basically saying that simply showing comparing two pictures doesn't prove anything; That One picture could have captured the event when it wasn't at its largest and then been deliberately used for comparison to one that was
If you check the time of the photo, and you can, it was taken DURING the speech, the point at which the mot people are present.
I know, act checking on your own is hard, but stop making up excuses before you even look to see if it's a valid excuse.
(January 22, 2017 at 7:06 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: Meanwhile the very OP of this thread is literally propagating a false story.Holy shit, his press secretary said it in a statement sanctioned by Trump. And hut he did say it looked to be "about a million and a half" in his own words.
top kek.
No need to decide; This is a forum; The exchange is all text and it ain't going anywhere. Point out where I'm lying (excluding the mistake that I already owned.)
Jessus fucking ahole christ. They try and shut down the news when they print facts, and this is your response. No wonder the country is fucked from people like you.
(January 22, 2017 at 8:17 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: The country has a thousand spy agencies and 10 million spies, 500,000 news agencies, spy satellites that can read a license plate number from outer space, and not one of them can determine how many people were at the inauguration. We need a giant asteroid to put us out of our misery.Link please. It was taken during his speech, that snapshot is when it was at it's fullest.
The top picture was taken several hours before noon, so of course there will be fewer people in it. But even so the Gestapo were inefficient at allowing people into the site and couldn't (or wouldn't) process a massive amount of people rapidly.
Here is timelapse of the crowd for of the entire event. Estimates are between 200k and 250k people, based on the crowd seen here and on the bus's taken. In any case, there is no way in freaking hell it was the largest ever. Large for a Republican? Kinda, it's not terribad. He should be happy with what he got and move the fuck on to, you know GOVERNING THE COUNTRY. Not defending his ego.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017...e-evidence
Wow, it is totally true. he could literally say ANYTHING, no matter the evidence, and his supporters take his word over demonstrable fact. The security thing he said in the press conference was also shown to be an outright lie.
Take a breather. Literally nothing you just said negates what you were responding to.
