RE: Question about Reagan
June 28, 2011 at 7:13 am
(This post was last modified: June 28, 2011 at 7:14 am by HeyItsZeus.)
(June 27, 2011 at 11:37 am)Chuck Wrote: No, he was an effective and proactive collaboratueur at the beginning, and remained effective, even if in gradually diminishing degrees, to the end.
Raegan's tax distribution (trickle down B.S.) was the beginning of a tremendous debt for the U.S. after periods of serious inflation.
![[Image: US_Federal_Debt_as_Percent_of_GDP_by_President.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=upload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fb%2Fb8%2FUS_Federal_Debt_as_Percent_of_GDP_by_President.jpg)
Bush continued this, Clinton balanced the budget, Bush II made it even worse along with Obama.
The reason the right loves him so much? Probably for these two main reasons.
More and more high class earners: rich people numbers more than doubled creating massive amounts of national cash flow under Raegan.
Often, he tried to implement his fundamentalist Christian values in policy.
Quote:"An individual has not started living until he can rise above the narrow confines of his individualistic concerns to the broader concerns of all humanity. "
Martin Luther King, Jr.
