Just to clarify I do understand what the point is.
What he's trying to say that if someone is willing to die for a cause then that person has justified that cause in their own mind.
But what he said is if someone dies for a cause then it is justified. Even if I don't agree with it then it's justified.
Which is basically like saying "that food tastes amazing. I didn't like it. But if someone else is willing to buy it and eat it repeatedly then it's tastes amazing."
What he's trying to say that if someone is willing to die for a cause then that person has justified that cause in their own mind.
But what he said is if someone dies for a cause then it is justified. Even if I don't agree with it then it's justified.
Which is basically like saying "that food tastes amazing. I didn't like it. But if someone else is willing to buy it and eat it repeatedly then it's tastes amazing."
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
