RE: This Catholic nun gets it
February 23, 2017 at 7:27 pm
(This post was last modified: February 23, 2017 at 7:53 pm by Amarok.)
Nope being anti abortion is the very opposite to being pro social .It's suppoting the blantant violation of a womans body and would no diffrent then me forcing an organ trasplant or a blood transfusion or the absurd medevil belief that raping a virgin would cure one of fatal dieses. And no it's intention or lack of are on the part of the fetus is a none issue. It's mere presence is a violation .Regadless of weather she choose to have sex or not she choose sex not pregenecy .And such condition should not be used as social control .And yes abortion is taking responsibilty so pro choicers can drop that nonsense . As for the argument of defeding somthing defensless .We kill defenseless things all the time. As for it being human thus an exception we allow for the killing of the defenseless humans as well. Oh and lastly the argument it had unique DNA proves it's a foreign enitity within a womans body . And the argument for brain activity shows the same . As does the arument from completness .even if it true undermines the Anti abortion argument not strengthens it.
We have already gone dubious claim of Church" charity " and "helping the poor" and no ideally the church should be cut out altogether and replaced with government programs . And it can't be force if you by default agreed to pay.
We have already gone dubious claim of Church" charity " and "helping the poor" and no ideally the church should be cut out altogether and replaced with government programs . And it can't be force if you by default agreed to pay.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb