(March 1, 2017 at 12:08 pm)Faith No More Wrote:(March 1, 2017 at 10:11 am)SteveII Wrote: Well, I would rather have a well constructed set of arguments that demonstrate that I have an internally consistent worldview, then to cobble together a bunch of "we don't knows", "brute facts", theories impossible to apply scientific methods to, and a huge list of assumptions without the possibility of ultimate answers.
Well, kudos for admitting that you'd rather make up answers than accept that certain things cannot be known. Maybe you can answer a question for which no one seems to have the solution. What is it about intellectual integrity that theists find so abhorrent? Why do you guys seem to think that acknowledging you don't know something is a weakness?
As I said in my post, I have reasons for everything I believe. There are some things that I do not know and will admit that I do not know--so your "weakness" conclusion is not true.
As far as intellectual integrity, it is easy to write that overused allegation. Do you have any specifics on how I am lacking?
