(March 3, 2017 at 12:57 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: I saw this in the linked Guardian article:
. . . The government’s commissioner for children, Katherine Zappone, said the findings were “sad and disturbing” and promised that the children’s families would be consulted on providing proper burials and other memorials . . .
Um, by definition, the Roman Catholic Church provided reasonable and appropriate care in disposing of all those children. They would be morally, spiritually, culturally, and religiously INCAPABLE of doing otherwise.
If they were buried in a septic tank, they weren't given their last rites as per catlick dogma. And given the ages of the babies (up to two years old), they would have been baptised thus making it mandatory that they got catlick last rights.
Remember these institutions were there for selling babies born out of wedlock off to American or Australian couples (in Bessborough for example the church got paid three times over for the babies, once from the state to provide "proper care" from the children, once from the families of the poor women for taking them in and forcing them into slave labour, and once from the adpotive couples they were illegaly selling babies to), so the kids buried in the septic tank were those considered too damaged goods to offload.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home