(March 3, 2017 at 9:03 pm)Nonpareil Wrote:(March 3, 2017 at 8:45 pm)SteveII Wrote: What the article explained (and you apparently missed) was that there are a host of considerations about the philosophy of time to consider that don't say over and over and over that "it's a dimension".
No, Steve. What you seem to fail to grasp is that time is a dimension. This is not a question of philosophy. It is straightforward, simple fact. Even the Wikipedia article - again, because you don't seem to be able to find anything more detailed than that - that you cite in an attempt to get around this doesn't offer any actual support for your rejection. In fact, it repeatedly states that it is so.
You are in plain denial of facts. Trying to act as though you are not will not change things.
Nor will it make your argument any less entirely incoherent.
(March 3, 2017 at 8:45 pm)SteveII Wrote: I do not believe that time, space or space-time exists.
Then you are a delusional fool.
(March 3, 2017 at 8:45 pm)SteveII Wrote: We observe physical objects, events and processes that stand in relationship to each other
...within dimensions called "space" and "time", yes.
Without these dimensions, there is nothing to stand in relationship to one another in, Steve.
Fine. You have 2 problems that I can see:
1. You are incapable of having a discussion.
2. Your grasp on reality is about an inch deep.
Actually, you got me to do about 3 hours of reading on the philosophy of time from Aristotle to now. I enjoyed learning. I did not enjoy wasting my time typing replies to someone that only knows one tune. Oh well 1 for 2 isn't bad.
