Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2024, 1:45 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trump's ban on Muslims
#49
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
(February 3, 2017 at 10:58 pm)Sterben Wrote:
(February 3, 2017 at 5:20 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: Remember how we roasted people in Dresden Germany and Tokyo?  We used flame throwers on enemy soldiers.  If it hadn't been for the nukes (which vaporized people) we would have burned Japan to the ground.   

You can Google the pictures.  The Draft feature isn't working so I can't do multiple links.  

Personally I think it takes someone who enjoys burning people alive to use a flame thrower on someone instead of just shooting him or blowing him up with a grenade.  

Blowing someone up with a high explosive bomb dropped from an airplane is bad but necessary.  However, to willingly drop firebombs on people requires that you like it.  We even did it in Vietnam.
        I would agree to certain extent, napalm was used to help clear the jungles out in The Vietnam war; beyond that it was cruel to use to in war. The flame thrower it self has always been questionable weapon, it had limited use other then for short range purposes. I'm sure some did enjoy dropping napalm, and setting people on fire to get their jolly's. I've seen the pictures and rare footage of burning men, woman, and children in both wars. The flame thrower was also used in the first world war by the Germans. Where i disagree with you is the fact we liked it seeing people on fire. If you set a city or a village on fire your sending a strong message that an invading army is going to burn as many as we can out of a deep rooted hatred.

       Seeing it with your eyes happening right in front of you must been horrifying. Those mental scars will last a life time, I'm also willing to bet that a lot solders regretted having to set another human being on fire. The smell of rotting human flesh must been of been something you got use to though. As long as you masked it behind the thought *I'm doing the right thing for my country.*

Remember, the GIs who used flamethrowers in the Pacific war were fighting an enemy very willing to fight to the last man (of 3,636 Japanese troops defending Tarawa, only 17 were captured -- all the rest had to be killed), who was usually honeycombed into the ground. Even though that war in particular was a deeply racist war from both sides, I agree with you that most Americans did not enjoy using flamethrowers ... or enjoy any other aspect of the war, for that matter.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Trump's ban on Muslims - by WinterHold - February 1, 2017 at 7:12 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - February 1, 2017 at 7:18 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by WinterHold - February 2, 2017 at 9:35 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by henryp - February 1, 2017 at 7:36 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by abaris - February 1, 2017 at 7:46 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by henryp - February 1, 2017 at 8:31 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Jackalope - February 1, 2017 at 8:50 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Wyrd of Gawd - February 1, 2017 at 9:41 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Tiberius - February 2, 2017 at 12:15 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Alex K - February 2, 2017 at 5:33 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Ben Davis - February 2, 2017 at 5:51 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Tiberius - February 2, 2017 at 9:19 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Redoubtable - February 1, 2017 at 8:59 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by The Industrial Atheist - February 1, 2017 at 10:47 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Sterben - February 1, 2017 at 11:32 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by The Industrial Atheist - February 1, 2017 at 11:47 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Catholic_Lady - February 2, 2017 at 12:01 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by SteelCurtain - February 2, 2017 at 12:34 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Wyrd of Gawd - February 2, 2017 at 5:14 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by robvalue - February 2, 2017 at 5:46 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Wyrd of Gawd - February 2, 2017 at 6:02 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by abaris - February 2, 2017 at 9:30 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by henryp - February 2, 2017 at 10:35 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Mister Agenda - February 2, 2017 at 10:50 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Wyrd of Gawd - February 2, 2017 at 4:34 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by downbeatplumb - February 2, 2017 at 1:59 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by henryp - February 2, 2017 at 10:26 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Faith No More - February 2, 2017 at 12:55 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by henryp - February 2, 2017 at 4:33 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Faith No More - February 2, 2017 at 6:38 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by henryp - February 3, 2017 at 1:59 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Mister Agenda - February 2, 2017 at 10:35 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Tiberius - February 2, 2017 at 11:58 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by robvalue - February 2, 2017 at 1:31 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by robvalue - February 2, 2017 at 2:09 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Sterben - February 2, 2017 at 10:01 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Wyrd of Gawd - February 3, 2017 at 5:20 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Sterben - February 3, 2017 at 10:58 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Thumpalumpacus - March 6, 2017 at 11:32 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by robvalue - February 3, 2017 at 3:12 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by SteelCurtain - February 3, 2017 at 3:15 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Silver - February 3, 2017 at 3:20 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by downbeatplumb - February 3, 2017 at 12:08 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by robvalue - February 3, 2017 at 3:23 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Silver - February 3, 2017 at 3:30 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Aroura - February 3, 2017 at 3:49 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by ReptilianPeon - February 3, 2017 at 4:20 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by robvalue - February 3, 2017 at 2:02 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by ukatheist - March 6, 2017 at 11:10 am
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by Amarok - March 6, 2017 at 7:41 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by WinterHold - March 6, 2017 at 8:13 pm
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims - by SteelCurtain - March 6, 2017 at 10:31 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What explains Macron’s obsession with Islam and Muslims? WinterHold 17 1957 October 27, 2020 at 12:48 pm
Last Post: Deesse23
  Are more Trump signs indicative of Trump winning? Dingo 15 1433 October 1, 2020 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Trump VS Trump (not exactly political news but I have no idea where to post this) Cepheus Ace 0 37788 February 12, 2019 at 2:15 am
Last Post: Cepheus Ace
  transgender military ban to go into effect Fake Messiah 20 3208 January 25, 2019 at 12:28 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Are Muslims the real threat? stupid rightist propaganda WinterHold 73 18431 November 1, 2017 at 9:09 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Will Muslims love Trump? They are whiny little bitches just like him. Greatest I am 1 1006 September 7, 2017 at 2:53 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  I'm awfully confused: how do Trump supporters relate to Trump NuclearEnergy 11 3526 March 7, 2017 at 4:24 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Pence Defends Trump’s Criticism of Judge Who Blocked Travel Ban Silver 3 930 February 5, 2017 at 9:41 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Do you think Muslims will dominate the world again like they used before? Defender 79 18476 January 3, 2017 at 4:24 am
Last Post: account_inactive
  Is Trump's election bad for Trump's businesses? Jehanne 22 4828 November 15, 2016 at 1:03 am
Last Post: CWoods



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)