(March 8, 2017 at 9:10 am)abaris Wrote:(March 8, 2017 at 9:06 am)Tazzycorn Wrote: I'm not so sure. Everything that Assange has received in the last three years has been from Russian state actors. And as the Democrat hacks have shown there's very little of actual intelligence value coming from Russia.
Look at the CIAs reaction. They're not denying it, they go down the usual road of looking for the leak. It is legit. Everything wikileaks published so far has been legit. There's a lot to be questioned about the personality of Assange, but the material he published never has been fake material.
When an organisation that hasn't published anything of value in years, a one that actual whistleblowers have abandoned en masse because of the owner's use of their material to push his political agenda and because he has shown a reckless disregard for both their safety and that of innocent third parties, I'm not going to trust anything it says until independent verification.
Assange isn't worthy of my trust.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home