Have you read the good book?

[Drich]

Wow indeed moron..

Or better yet how isn't God standing before you NOT Proof of God?

Or are you Soo brainwashed your response to everything offered as proof of God is to simply deny it?

If God is not proof of God, then what is?

What an idiotic statement.  You've never offered proof of your god, or even real evidence.  You're so deep into the woo that you think others are brainwashed for not swallowing your tripe. Pathetic.

Hey, dummy

I'm asking you what "proof of God is" If not God Himself? After all if you want proof Donald Trump was really the president and I cold put you in a chair across from Him in the oval office, what better proof could their be? So again why would this not work for God? You want proof of God I know how to get you infront of him, but if this somehow is not enough for you now is your turn to school me. I'm asking you to describe your real/true evidence would look like.

Because if you don't know what real proof is, how can you know when it is being presented?

Seems to me little minds, are simply been trained to poo poo on everything despite what is offered. If this is not true then you should be able to offer an example or two of what 'real proof' you are looking for.

If not, know you are not the only little fly I've caught with this web. few of you can think past "that's not proof" algorithm (simply repeat that's not proof to anything offered)

---

Why do you call people names?

It usally just starts out Tit for tat.
Usally in the beginning noob do alot of name calling and or alot of ad hoc stuff, but as time and they get a feel of who I am they drop the names.

And other times it is out of frustration. Being called stupid 100 times aday wears on me especially when the offernder is the one who is wrong.

Or better yet how isn't God standing before you NOT Proof of God?
[quote]
Because if he is standing there, then he is invisible. Seriously man, you saying that really discredits anything else you have to say.

See this is a point where I want to call you a name because you can not fathom the f-ing obvious, despite what Ive said over and over...

As in WHAT IF HE IS NOT INVISIBLE!!!

would that then be proof?

How many times have Ive gone on and on about how Biblical Christianity is different than any other religion in the world in that it puts the believer in one on one contact with God!

You have provided absolutely no proof at all. You have provided very questionable evidence but it isn't very compelling.

I'm not offering proof I'm offering God. It is God's job to offer proof/open your eyes. My job is to point you to the spot He tells us to stand.

God would be proof of God. We don't have any issues accepting something as proof of something.

I accept the fact that I have an iPhone because I am replying to you with it. This is a very basic concept. I don't know why do don't understand it.

How about this: My Accessibility to God is akin if not easier than my accessibility to God. As that is how I often times answer your posts.
So then if you are offered the same accessibility could you then see why proof of God could then be found in God?