RE: Theists: What is the most compelling argument you have heard for Atheism?
March 16, 2017 at 10:41 am
(March 16, 2017 at 10:35 am)Harry Nevis Wrote:(March 16, 2017 at 9:37 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Personally, people who read the canon in order from start to finish are ill-advised. That may leave you with a basic biblical timeline, which is a good thing, but also leads to much confusion. The texts have to be read both forwards and backwards to draw out all the foreshadowing and typology. My favorite technique is finding a common phrase, consulting a concordance, and then comparing how it is used in each instance. The texts open up in unexpected ways to reveal hidden themes and allusions threading their way through the narrative. These threads tie the stories together just as Jesus said, "If you believed Moses then you would believe me..." (John 5:46) I find that approach more helpful than the typical topical approaches most bible study groups use. Those seem more like proof-texting clubs. I'd be happy to share videos of some study groups that take that approach, albeit from a Swedenborgian perspective, for anyone who is interested.
Just another bullshit response. "I read the bible, but still don't buy it." "You're reading it in the wrong direction!"
All I am saying is that dismissing the bible based on a superficial reading of the 66 canonical texts doesn't do justice to their richness and complexity. It also seems anti-intellectual.