RE: Theists: What is the most compelling argument you have heard for Atheism?
March 24, 2017 at 1:05 pm
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2017 at 1:10 pm by Angrboda.)
(March 24, 2017 at 11:56 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(March 24, 2017 at 11:28 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Right. No conflict with science at all.
Not sure what your point is here. Sure the events of the bible do not square with ontological naturalism
You should have stopped here. Instead you go on to post foolish nonsense.
(March 24, 2017 at 11:56 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: but neither do today's scientific findings exclude the exceptional events described within the biblical narrative.
"It coulda happened..." That's incredibly weak shit, Chad. What it does do is impugns their credibility. Only an irrational person believes things that aren't credible.
(March 24, 2017 at 11:56 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Many geological features can occur naturally. Then occasionally we come across something like this:
A set of small rocks balanced upon one another? Really Chad. Your apologetic here is a total fail. Things like a global flood or striped goats are indeed ruled out by science. Your pointing to unlikely events actually happening is a conflation between unlikely and implausible.
My point is that there are indeed conflicts between science and the bible. And your attempt to defend them is stupid and inane.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)