RE: What is logic?
March 26, 2017 at 9:29 am
(This post was last modified: March 26, 2017 at 10:37 am by Angrboda.)
(March 26, 2017 at 8:00 am)Little Rik Wrote:(March 25, 2017 at 9:43 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: You're really a dumbfuck. That's a speculative popular article about what the pineal gland may be. That doesn't even come close to providing scientific backing for your claims.
Imbecilethat article show that for thousand years different spiritual people living east-west, north-south
and everywhere in between were already aware of the importance of the pineal gland.
What instead your scientific studies did in the meantime?
Dumbfuck, that article didn't even back up the specific claims you made. It just rambled on about other people's claims. And claims by themselves don't amount to "awareness". All they are is speculation. Guesses, nothing more. They "guess" that the pineal gland is important, but they don't "know" anything. So your article amounts to a big fat nothing. For thousands of years people were "aware" that the earth was flat as well. Look how that turned out.
(March 26, 2017 at 8:00 am)Little Rik Wrote: NOTHING yog, absolutely nothing.![]()
![]()
Still to these days science know nothing about the role of the pineal gland except that secrete melatonin.
So the fuck what? All that these traditions know about the purpose of the pineal gland is a big fat nothing as well. The traditions make all sorts of guesses, which are worthless. They don't know the purpose of the pineal gland anymore than science does. And their guesses weren't the same as yours anyway, so how in hell does that provide support for you? It doesn't.
(March 26, 2017 at 8:00 am)Little Rik Wrote: What a big deal yog!![]()
Do me a favor yog.
Come back to me when science will discover what the pineal gland is there for.
No, you do me a favor and shut up with these stupid claims about the pineal gland which you can't even back up with other people's guesses. When you have actual evidence that the pineal gland functions in the way you've claimed, then you can talk. Until then, it's been established that you have no evidence showing that induced experiences are different from NDEs. You've just got a failed attempt at providing support. For all your evidence can say, NDEs are induced experiences.
(March 26, 2017 at 8:00 am)Little Rik Wrote: In the meantime please go back to sleep.
Can't handle me, huh? That's no surprise, because you're a fucking loser who can't even support his own case even with made up guesses. What a buffoon.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)