Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 19, 2025, 4:43 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Global Warming denial an article of religious faith | BBC
#10
RE: Global Warming denial an article of religious faith | BBC
(July 10, 2011 at 1:57 pm)Rhythm Wrote: So, the fog that became synonymous with London had nothing to do with the amount of soot in the air...nothing at all? It's not an example of ACC, even on a small scale?
Look, London was already accustomed to thick fogs, know why? Because after WW2 it was an economic necessity to import cheap crap coal from abroad (mainly Poland) which meant that better-quality 'hard' Welsh coals were exported, which increased the amount of sulphur dioxide in the smoke, consequently while coal-fired power stations at Battersea *reduced the output of soot* to the best of our knowledge it was at the cost of *increased sulphur dioxide*. Additionally, after WW2 the electric tram system was abandoned, this meant a substantial increase in vehicle exhaust from the diesel-fuelled buses which had replaced the trams. Soot was a contributing factor, but not responsible for the great smog alone.

And since when was air pollution an example of climate change? You have to be messing with me. Next minute you'll be arguing the radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl disaster is an example of human-induced climate change. Believe me, I won't be sticking around if you do.


(July 10, 2011 at 2:51 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: Wait - so human produced pollutants (SO2) in an environment had no effect in the winter of 1952? If they did not, then humans are not to blame.

Please clarify.
The anticyclone settled over a windless London, causing a temperature inversion, this collected the airborne pollutants already present in the air over the city to form a *thicker layer of smog* over the city.

The airborne pollutants did NOT induce the anticyclone. The air pollution did NOT influence the weather. The weather influenced the airborne pollutants to form the thicker than usual layer of smog. As soon as the weather changed the smog dispersed quickly. To imply otherwise is to make a horribly invalid causal connection.

And WTF Moros? Why kudos Rhythm's response if you're asking me for clarification because you supposedly didn't understand my previous post? Are you being serious with me? 0_o
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Global Warming denial an article of religious faith | BBC - by Welsh cake - July 10, 2011 at 5:10 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  BBC Documentary about a real world "cure" for autism - youtube Duty 13 2323 September 28, 2021 at 2:32 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Cicadas and global warming. Brian37 0 570 May 22, 2021 at 1:59 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Vaccines: Low trust in vaccination 'a global crisis' zebo-the-fat 20 3569 September 6, 2019 at 8:28 am
Last Post: LastPoet
  Look Out, Suicide Article brewer 0 828 December 22, 2016 at 5:38 pm
Last Post: brewer
  "How to Change Someone's Mind" Wash. Post. article drfuzzy 0 1107 February 25, 2016 at 11:48 am
Last Post: drfuzzy
  An article entitled "Statements that evolutionists can't answer" potch 14 3521 April 27, 2014 at 9:15 pm
Last Post: SteelCurtain
  Faith: Preferred or Not in Medicine? Gawdkins 4 1632 March 4, 2013 at 9:07 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  Evolution, the Bible, and the 3.5 Million Dollar Violin - my article Jeffonthenet 99 62081 September 4, 2012 at 11:50 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Origins of Us BBC documentary 5thHorseman 12 6213 October 19, 2011 at 4:31 pm
Last Post: HeyItsZeus
  Why is there only one human species? | BBC Anymouse 18 6639 June 25, 2011 at 6:33 am
Last Post: martin02



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)