RE: Theists: What is the most compelling argument you have heard for Atheism?
March 29, 2017 at 2:48 pm
(This post was last modified: March 29, 2017 at 2:54 pm by Brian37.)
(March 29, 2017 at 2:32 pm)SteveII Wrote:(March 29, 2017 at 2:06 pm)Harry Nevis Wrote: I still don't see the evidence that the FTA refers to.
The evidence is the fine-tuning. The argument discusses what we can infer from the evidence.
HELLO MCFLY the "fine tuning" argument is bullshit, and every religion has tried to pull it. IT DOES NOT WORK! It does not work when Christians pull it, it does not work when Muslims pull it, it does not work when Jews pull it.
"fine tuning" is simply bullshit falling for your emotions because you find pretty things in nature and the universe. SO THE FUCK WHAT, there are plenty of nasty harmful things on our planet that DO NOT benefit humans alone, nasty things that kill us all the time. The solar system also has comets and asteroids that have hit the planets in our solar system. A meteor killed off the dinosaurs. You claim that kind of destruction and death is "fine tuned". I don't that looks more like the behavior of a fucking drunk driver. So unless you want to claim your God is inept, or a dick and we are his lab rats or toys, maybe the reality is there is no god and this is simply what our universe turned out to be.
But if you are going to insert a prime mover you are STILL STUCK with WHICH ONE, Allah/Yahweh/Brahama/Vishnu?
Is ecoli "fine tuned"? Is childhood cancer "fine tuned"? The fact humans can choke on their food and die, that is "fine tuned"? Are cockroaches "fine tuned"?
You are so full of shit. Life and the universe do have pretty things in it SO THE FUCK WHAT, it is also mostly empty and hostile to life. If you want to claim this is efficient you are a moron. That seems like of a ton of waste to me with very little output.
