Theists: What is the most compelling argument you have heard for Atheism?

[Brian37]

---

I read the whole article. It does not support your assertion other than a theory (perhaps M-Theory), when it is formulated, can answer the question. That does not sound settled to me. A particular telling paragraph in the article was (emphasis added): 


Regarding the probability, I understand your point that if we do not know the range, we cannot assign probability. However, why isn't the range of possible values unlimited? What factor(s) could constrain the constants of the universe before the universe? Or are you saying that one constant could be a restraint on another before the universe existed? Why?

Physicists posit a multiverse for the express reason to overcome the odds of getting the constants we have? Are you saying they are wrong?

---

I think that it's reasonable that some of these constants could be different; depending on initial.  The expansion rate of the universe comes to mind.  
But, even if some cannot be different; such as the strong or weak nuclear force.   We can still figure what would happen if they where different.  Which begs the question of being constrained to such a fortunate and fine tuned limit.

"Strong weak nuclear force=fortunate that Allah did it"
"Strong weak nuclear force=fortunate that Yahweh did it"
"Strong weak nuclear force=fortunate that Brahma did it".

Yep you accept nuclear technology as existing, well so does electricity which makes up lightening so by your logic Thor exists. 

Still stuck with "which one" to fill in that gap. And I also bet neither of you have taken the time to do a simple google search and look up "Muslim Science" or "Jewish Science" or "Hindu Science" or "Buddhist science". 

Both of you are too afraid that Ocham's razor says the least complicated postulated answer is the most likely solution. Both of you still refuse to consider that the evidence points to humans making up god claims.