RE: Theists: What is the most compelling argument you have heard for Atheism?
March 31, 2017 at 3:30 pm
(March 31, 2017 at 1:40 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(March 31, 2017 at 12:55 pm)Brian37 Wrote: QM nor string theory or m theory are claiming a "loony tunes" world. The problem with all religions when they shit their pants because science is constantly filling in the gaps with natural answers, do not understand that scientific language is not the same definition that the theist wants it to be.
Loony is thinking an old unscientific book of myth is a science textbook, that is loony.
Same bullshit mistake theists make with the word "theory" . It is not a mere guess as theists want it to be. In scientific terms it is a definition of repeated experimentation that has repeated confirmed observations over time. QM does not claim anything goes like a theist wants it to be. It certainly points to things that laypeople think of as "freaky" but it is not there to justify Allah or Thor or Yoda.
QM paints things we are not used to thinking about as laypeople, but it is not magic, it is math, not hocus pocus. It is not there to prop up the bible or koran or Torah or Vedas or Buddha.
(Sigh)...the non sequiturs never end... Please, Brian, the adults are trying to have a real conversation here.
Non- sequitur=therefore Allah........
Non-sequitur=therefore Yahweh......
Non- sequitur=therefore Buddha.......
Non-sequitur=therefore Brahama......
I am an adult, I am not the one clinging to an old book of mythology written by humans who didn't know where the sun went at night.
