RE: Theists: What is the most compelling argument you have heard for Atheism?
March 31, 2017 at 4:54 pm
(March 31, 2017 at 4:46 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(March 31, 2017 at 4:34 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Repeating is not trolling. Trolling is what religion has done for 10,000 years. It takes the skeptic over time to tell people and keep repeating to people "that is not true" over time for humans to ditch bad claims.
Now again, and yes I will keep repeating it. If any one religion got it right it would be very easy to prove in a neutral lab with neutral method and independent peer review.
You are not proving anything, you are attempting, like every religion does, trying to retrofit science after the bad claim was made.
There is no god/spirit/deity/GOD out there handing us information. No, that is not comforting to most humans. But your apology here doesn't work, just like you don't convert to another religion or god claim. I merely reject one more religion and one more god claim than you do.
You are not arguing science, you are using science and bastardizing neutral method to avoid being honest and saying you have nothing but an apology.
Go find the entire COSMOS series all 13 episodes hosted by Neil Degrassee Tyson, could give you some insight as to how time after time the gatekeepers got it wrong. It could give you insight as to what I am doing and why I am doing it.
Perhaps you should try to actually address what people are saying. Or we can look at what you are claiming if you prefer. I think it is a bunch of bad logic and incorrect thinking.... but we can examine it more closely.
Why? Ochams razor does not need convoluted arguments.
Your choices are.
1. There really is a divine/spirit/god world.
Or.
2. Humans make them up.
Out of those choices which seems to be more likely? Is it likely Apollo is real or made up? Is it likely that Thor is real or made up? Would using fine tuning convince you of those gods? No? Why not? If it works for you and is an unbias tactic then it should work for everyone who wants to use it including any other religion.
Now, think about all the dead mythologies and other god claims and religions you don't buy. Why is it you reject all others besides yours? If using science to argue for another religion doesn't convince you to convert to another religion, why should I give you any special treatment?
If others here want to wade through your bad tactic sentence by sentence, they are more than welcome to. I am simply cutting to the chase, and trying to jar you out of your fantasy at a quicker pace.
