Theists: What is the most compelling argument you have heard for Atheism?

[RoadRunner79]

---

No, but his point is bad logic to begin with, and doesn't effect what was being discussed in the slightest.  No one is saying that this shows evidence for a specific god, but some general descriptions, that are normally attributed to something that we would call god.  Just because the gunpowder residue on the suspect's hands, don't show that he did shoot the victim, we don't throw that evidence out.  Or for a closer analogy, just because the evidence shows that it was murder, but doesn't point to a specific person, you don't ignore the evidence, and declare natural causes, as the reason for the death.  Similarly, I would laugh at a defense attorney, who gave the reason, that you reject all the other billions of people on the planet for committing the crime, I just ask you to reject one more in his client.  It doesn't follow.  

And yet again, if you look at a number of the fallacies, you will notice a pattern, that they do not effect the logic or reasons, given.   That is why they are fallacious.

Here is where human narcissism kicks in. You know the song by Carly Simon "You probably think this song is about you".

My involvement started with SteveII, not you. That is when I first noticed the "fine tuning" argument, which I have seen for over a decade, not just here. You jumped in and kept responding to my responses. 

You need to stop taking this personally. This is not about you. Yes I am repeatedly responding to you, because you keep repeatedly responding. But this is not here for you. This is for EVERYONE who might read it, including Jews and Muslims or Hindus or Buddhists. It is also here for atheists so they can see OUR responses. When you have a good argument, you don't need to be afraid of it being public. 

Now in another thread on this website I am arguing with one of our resident MUSLIMS, Mystic Night. But you don't notice that do you? You think I am singling you out? No, I am responding to bad logic, just like I am responding to his bad logic.

And in that thread in the past 15 minutes we have REPEATEDLY exchanged responses.

Now again, when you say 

  No one is saying that this shows evidence for a specific god,

---

You missed where I said on a couple of occasions how long I have been debating religion, NOT JUST HERE, not just with you and not just on this website.

I have seen countless times someone come to a page, not just here, and try to sell a specific claim. When I say "so what everyone does that" they back peddle to " I am not arguing a specific god" then when they think we are not looking, they try to pull you back to their specific claim. 

I'm discussing ideas.... you can hide behind imagined tactics that you think you see; as a way to divert the discussion, but I'm not buying it.   The one thing I never seen on any of your lists, that you often repeated, is materialism.   That is because it doesn't work.  
Perhaps you see "back peddling", because you where making wrong assumptions to begin with.   If you where following the discussion and understanding it, I don't think that there was any back peddling.  I'm not really here to be selling anything.... I'm here for discussion, and to here what you have to say.   So far, I think that most of what you are responding to, is only in your head.