Theists: What is the most compelling argument you have heard for Atheism?

[Brian37]

I could care less if you want to "discuss" if you thought this was merely a place where we roll over, then you picked the wrong place.

I am not assuming. I am betting. I bet that you do have a specific club and a specific book. 

I bet if we put you on a polygraph you would be lying saying you are not advocating a specific book or specific God.

Now again, I am willing to admit when I am wrong. But again, been at this for 16 years. So to everyone reading this, the next time he posts ANYWHERE on this website, about his particular book, and I bet he will, remind him of what you read in this post.

In these arguments... no I am not advancing a specific book or tradition. Mostly because it doesn't follow from the argument.   That however does not mean, that apart from that, I do not have any other connected beliefs, or reasons for them. 

Your not going to manipulate me into your straw man.... Since you want to argue for the both of us however; I'm done.That however does not mean, that apart from that, I do not have any other connected beliefs, or reasons for them.  

So you do admit to having a pet claim? 

That however does not mean, that apart from that, I do not have any other connected beliefs, or reasons for them.  

Of course you do have a specific claim, thank you for proving my point. So again, "I am not trying to prove as specific god" is bullshit by proxy of you right now admitting YOU DO have a bias. 

There is no "apart from that". 

Stop playing word games with me. Admit you have a specific God and a specific book.

---

I could care less if you want to "discuss" if you thought this was merely a place where we roll over, then you picked the wrong place.

I am not assuming. I am betting. I bet that you do have a specific club and a specific book. 

I bet if we put you on a polygraph you would be lying saying you are not advocating a specific book or specific God.

Now again, I am willing to admit when I am wrong. But again, been at this for 16 years. So to everyone reading this, the next time he posts ANYWHERE on this website, about his particular book, and I bet he will, remind him of what you read in this post.

In these arguments... no I am not advancing a specific book or tradition. Mostly because it doesn't follow from the argument.   That however does not mean, that apart from that, I do not have any other connected beliefs, or reasons for them. 

Your not going to manipulate me into your straw man.... Since you want to argue for the both of us however; I'm done.

Of course you are done. If you had anything valid you wouldn't have to simply "discuss", you'd have a patent and a Nobel Prize by now and the ability to quote independent peer reviewed journals.