What is logic?

[Angrboda]

So you're an anti-intellectual in addition to all your other failings.  Sour grapes I'd say.


Well if it's so simple, then you should have no trouble explaining it to us.  Sarkar starts out by explaining that material things cannot deliver permanent satisfaction because they're finite, that you need the infinite, i.e. Brahma, to provide permanent satisfaction.  He then makes a lot of assertions about atman and the nature of mind, and concludes by saying that the foregoing proves the existence of Brahma, i.e. the infinite.  This is nothing less than a proof that permanent satisfaction is possible.

We're in luck, that's exactly what this thread is about! If you could prove that permanent satisfaction is possible, i.e. that Brahma exists, you'd be way ahead in proving the importance of all the rest of the stuff you talk about.   So I suggest you prove to us that it is possible, using Sarkar's essay as a guide.  If you can't do that, then you're full of shit and you know nothing about Brahma or permanent peace of mind.

So get to proving it!  Enough trash talk, let's see some action!

Correct.
Enough trash talk so now you start engaging in practice because the practice is the only way to experience the permanent peace of mind.

I can not pass to you the progress I did achieved so far so you can not know what it is all about but even if I could I would not.
Why?
Because you got to get up your shiny backside from the lazy chair and start doing your own hard work like everybody else.  

I do charity to those in need but I will not give anything to fools that  will waste what is given to them.

It took you a full day to think up that brilliant retort, eh?

Baha! You don't understand your own guru! Haha! Little Rik is Stoopid!

You can't explain his proof, can you? Well don't worry. It isn't you. It's your guru. His "proof" is full of shit.

But then, you're the idiot who follows him without understanding him. What a clueless dick you are.