(April 24, 2017 at 10:01 pm)SteveII Wrote:(April 24, 2017 at 9:02 pm)Jehanne Wrote: His own words were quite clear. In response to Kuhn's question, Moreland believes that single and multi-cellular organisms have an immaterial aspect to them. It's borderline animism.
Paraphrasing, he said that any life that is greater than the sum of its parts has a least a rudimentary soul. He was also quite clear that he thought only humans have an immortal soul--existing on past the death of its body (so the title of this thread is nothing but made up, unhinged hatred for people you are just not equipped to understand).
He never said that. He implied that the "souls" of dogs and humans were different, but he never said that a dog's soul does not survive the death of its body. All of this is adhoc bullshit. If a dog has a soul and that soul ceases to exist after its death, why not the same with a human?
