(April 25, 2017 at 7:51 am)SteveII Wrote:(April 25, 2017 at 12:12 am)Jehanne Wrote: He never said that. He implied that the "souls" of dogs and humans were different, but he never said that a dog's soul does not survive the death of its body. All of this is adhoc bullshit. If a dog has a soul and that soul ceases to exist after its death, why not the same with a human?
Yes he did. You have to work on your comprehension skills.
He said only human souls continue on after death: quote "God sustains them".
Who knows? Who cares? If god/dog can sustain humans, he/she/it can do the same with non-human animals.
It's just a bunch of crap, no different than saying that humans were deposited in volcanoes by space aliens long ago.
