RE: Challenge
May 2, 2009 at 6:05 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2009 at 6:11 pm by fr0d0.)
(May 2, 2009 at 2:15 pm)Sai Wrote: Taking the Bible literally is synonymous to looking at it through the lens of empiricism. It doesn't work, it's like hammering a nail in with rubber. Yet, it's what even so-called believers continually attempt to do.
I think it's a lot like looking at a long mathematical formula and expecting it to make sense if you read it like a novel. You won't have much fun with that...
And in the case of the bible, the truth in it must be experienced and felt, not analyzed like a factual document. It should be looked upon more like a piece of art or music and not like a history book. The way to read it properly is innate to us, but I think it can't be forced or taught in sunday school or at church (actually, trying to teach it makes it usually only harder to understand). That's why so many people falsly use it for immoral ends... and it's also why Jesus wasn't a big fan of churches.
Just like it's insane to try to read the theory of relativity like a suspense novel, it won't get you far if you take the bible literal. But if read properly, you will find an enormous amount of value in both.
Damn! U good!
Welcome Sai
(May 2, 2009 at 4:14 pm)Sai Wrote: Jesus didn't go around claiming to be the son of god.
erm... yes he did