Subjective Morals and Societal Whims

[brewer]

[edit]

---

A Welcome Woof.

I've got lots of questions before I respond, if you don't mind.

Can you give examples of the "youtubes on atheism"? Did they have an agenda (i,e, religious)?

Why do you think atheism = naturalism? I can assure you it does not, but I'll give you the chance to state why it does. 

What modern cultures consider pedophilia acceptable? You can exclude the catholic church if you like.

Morals are subjective/relative. You have not provided sufficient argument for me to consider that pedophilia is objectively wrong under all circumstances and in all conditions. Stanford can support my position better than I can (the written word is not my forte): https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-relativism/

Also: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-realism/

No theists are naturalists, but all atheists are naturalists.

You are point and case when you said, "Morals are subjective/relative. You have not provided sufficient argument for me to consider that pedophilia is objectively wrong under all circumstances and in all conditions."

You are open to Add to dictionary. No Christian is open to Pedophilia. You are similar to Muslims who also allow pedophilia since Muhammad had sex with a 9 year old girl.

[edit]

Thanks for the lack of intelligent response or valid argument. 

Provide evidence that atheist = naturalist. I don't think you possess that capability to do so.

You appear to be an excellent example of christian religious ignorance. Good Job! Home school???

BTW, Islam/muslim is a religion with a god and claims to have objective morals. So it's a religion permitting pedophilia, or was this fact oblivious to you?

Bible things for you to look up: Numbers 31:1-18, Deut 20: 10-14, Judges 21:7-11 and 21:20-23. Sounds like underage sex to the scholars. [edit] And this after getting permission to wack the parents. Got to love those morals.