Come on Atlas, read a science book. If you want to know anwser to that question take Stephen Hawking "Brief History of Time" (you know one of the most famous books of our times). In it Hawking writes "There was in fact no singularity at the beginning of the universe." This conclusion follows from quantum mechanics, the theory of atomic processes that was developed in the years following the introduction of Einstein's theories of relativity. Quantum mechanics, which also is now confirmed to great precision, tells us that general relativity, at least as currently formulated, must break down at times less than the Planck time and at distances smaller than the Planck length. It follows that general relativity cannot be used to imply that a singularity occurred prior to the Planck time and that Craig's use of the singularity theorem for a beginning of time is invalid.
Universe probably never had a beginning. We can always have one event follow another, and we can always have one event precede another.
And also I made a topic about this in science section. It should still be on the 1st page.
Universe probably never had a beginning. We can always have one event follow another, and we can always have one event precede another.
And also I made a topic about this in science section. It should still be on the 1st page.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
