(May 20, 2017 at 1:52 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: You really don't know what I think about this. I'll tell you this, though -- discounting an entire line of evidence a priori marks you as a person who doesn't merit serious consideration, because you're wedded to your hypothesis rather than facts.
To be fair we don't have the evidence, and I need to come out and say that. The investigation so far is running into a cover up, that really points to a larger problem, of how 44,000 emails ended up getting sent to wikileaks, and then being released. The whole narrative from the beginning was constructed by the DNC. At first they said the emails were fake, and not to read them. Then they said they were real and they were hacked. Then the narrative changed to Russia, even when Julian Assange said Russia wasn't the source. Then Seth Rich was murdered, and wikileaks offered a reward for information about his death. The DNC offered no reward, and wanted the story to go away. You have to wonder why, especially since it was killed before he was going to testify about corruption in the DNC.
Then when the emails started being looked at it was found the DNC was working with the media to control the narrative for the election. It wasn't unbiased media coverage, and still isn't.
The investigation is getting started and stonewalled, and barely covered by the media who was caught in the emails working with the Clinton campaign. It's a big story because it's just one part of a larger story of corruption, which has been going on for years, before Trump even decided to run. Trump is going to open up the vault, and allow the American people to see the corruption.
