Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 26, 2024, 6:02 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Potential candidates in 2020
#50
RE: Potential candidates in 2020
(June 23, 2017 at 11:34 pm)Court Jester Wrote: [quote pid='1573706' dateline='1498262248']


I don't favor dicking over the poor on healthcare. I favor fixing the problem. Other countries have better healthcare because they don't charge $200 for a bandaid or $700 just to be admired to the emergency room. That's before they do anything. Hell, it's $100,000+ for a few pills for cancer that may not cure you. Open your eyes. I'm all for better, but I have a wider focus than to pay higher taxes to a screwed up system. Fix the root cause of the issue before you just fork over the money.

What you need is socialised healthcare like the rest of the developed world, free at point of use and payed for by taxation. It works and doesn't penalise the ones most in need. Unfortunately for you the republicans will veto anything that helps people who need it so the rich can keep the maximum amount of money to themselves.

(June 23, 2017 at 11:34 pm)Court Jester Wrote: You're not the first person to call me a racist or a bigot because I want the borders locked down or just because you heard that I support trump.

There is a reason for that.

(June 23, 2017 at 11:34 pm)Court Jester Wrote: Narrow minded people always think that before they see my wife who's mother is black and father is from Mexico. My father in law thinks they should come in legally too. We have a legal system to control population, job availability, and the economy too. Big picture homey. There is one.  Look at it. Look for the facts before you start making false accusations too.

So your playing the "some of my friends are black" card. The oldest play in the racists handbook.

(June 23, 2017 at 11:34 pm)Court Jester Wrote: I own my own company and I can assure you that today's unions in the US are the issue. Japan, Netherlands, England, etc. all have a HUGE union following. The difference is that they work with the company and not against the company. You won't find someone making $38 an hour to hand out work gloves and stare at the wall all day. That would never fly over seas. They also wouldn't go on strike when someone calls in sick every Monday and Friday for theee months straight. We have a huge union plant about a mile from my shop. I only have 60 employees, but I pay the hourly guys about $4.00 more per hour, offer far better insurance, and I've never had a lay off. 100 years ago, unions were definitely needed. No question about it, but the unions today are sponges that hurt American companies and workers in the long run. If they worked as they do in Japan and Europe, I would be 100% for them. They help the workers and they help the companies do better which helps the workers that much more. Travel a little bit. You'll learn a bit more.

Hello from a brit here. The power of our unions was crushed when the tories purposely destroyed our industrial base to get rid of them, there were running battles in the streets...but your an American and the world stops at the oceans for most of you it was in the eighties. We were moved from an industrial to a service based society and it fucked us up.
You have strong unions, congratulations, that means you still have industries. We don't.

(June 23, 2017 at 11:34 pm)Court Jester Wrote: As above; College shouldn't be free until they fix the problems. $800 per credit hour and $300+ for a text book. Sometimes more than one text book, each at $300+. And then they'll change one page in the book and sell more as a "revision #32". Student loans are so high? Fix the root cause. That black Mexican woman I'm such a bigot for marrying paid off her psychology loans. I know that they suck, but don't jack up taxes and pay the schools far more than they are worth. Again, big picture.

Spend a little less on the military and the US could school the whole world and still have money to spare. You spend money in stupid places.

(June 23, 2017 at 11:34 pm)Court Jester Wrote: Global warming; I don't have a definitive argument for outside of my own view. Al Gore has a home in Tennessee that at least did have one of the highest electric usages for the state and doesn't have a single solar panel, wind mill, nothing. But he does own a shit ton of stocks and partial ownerships to several companies in the "green" industry. As far as I'm concerned, it's all a money making scheme. We're far cleaner than we were 100 or 50 years ago. I'm just not buying it. For each scientist saying it's real, there's others that say it's either a natural earth cycle or just not real.

Wow you are so wrong 97% of scientists working on climate agree that man made climate change is real and significantly dangerous to human life 97% not the 50/50 ratio you seem to have imagined.

(June 23, 2017 at 11:34 pm)Court Jester Wrote: And really... if it was a real issue that was going to kill us governments would be forcing people to do absolutely whatever it took to reverse it. No recommendations. It would be 100% requirements. No questions asked. Until someone can really prove it to me, I rank it right up there with the bible.

Yes it should be a 100% requirement,the world agrees and your fucking president just pulled out because he seems to want to kill the world.

(June 23, 2017 at 11:34 pm)Court Jester Wrote: And liberals are looked down on for having such narrow views on issues and move right away to personal attacks rather than looking at at least a few facts.

You seem to have confused the term liberal with "narrow minded blow hard idiot"



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply



Messages In This Thread
Potential candidates in 2020 - by NuclearEnergy - June 21, 2017 at 6:35 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Jesster - June 21, 2017 at 6:37 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Minimalist - June 21, 2017 at 6:44 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by vorlon13 - June 21, 2017 at 6:48 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Jackalope - June 21, 2017 at 6:49 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Jackalope - June 21, 2017 at 6:50 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by vorlon13 - June 21, 2017 at 6:58 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by The Valkyrie - June 21, 2017 at 6:59 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Brian37 - June 21, 2017 at 7:03 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Losty - June 21, 2017 at 7:19 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Minimalist - June 21, 2017 at 7:41 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Losty - June 21, 2017 at 7:43 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by NuclearEnergy - June 21, 2017 at 7:43 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Losty - June 21, 2017 at 7:45 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Minimalist - June 22, 2017 at 11:56 am
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Thumpalumpacus - June 21, 2017 at 8:04 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by vorlon13 - June 21, 2017 at 7:04 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by NuclearEnergy - June 21, 2017 at 7:30 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by vorlon13 - June 21, 2017 at 7:25 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Thumpalumpacus - June 21, 2017 at 7:36 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by NuclearEnergy - June 21, 2017 at 7:37 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by henryp - June 21, 2017 at 7:39 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Cecelia - June 22, 2017 at 2:46 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by chimp3 - June 22, 2017 at 6:11 am
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Crossless1 - June 22, 2017 at 10:55 am
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Divinity - June 22, 2017 at 11:06 am
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by A Theist - June 22, 2017 at 11:36 am
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Brian37 - June 22, 2017 at 12:21 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by The Grand Nudger - June 22, 2017 at 11:54 am
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by vorlon13 - June 22, 2017 at 12:25 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Minimalist - June 22, 2017 at 12:29 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Mister Agenda - June 22, 2017 at 2:33 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Iroscato - June 22, 2017 at 4:32 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Court Jester - June 22, 2017 at 4:49 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by The Grand Nudger - June 22, 2017 at 4:50 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Court Jester - June 22, 2017 at 4:57 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Minimalist - June 22, 2017 at 5:05 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - June 23, 2017 at 6:02 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Court Jester - June 23, 2017 at 6:31 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - June 23, 2017 at 6:48 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Brian37 - June 23, 2017 at 7:57 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Court Jester - June 23, 2017 at 11:34 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Brian37 - June 24, 2017 at 7:36 am
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Court Jester - June 24, 2017 at 1:12 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by downbeatplumb - June 24, 2017 at 8:50 am
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Court Jester - June 24, 2017 at 9:53 am
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by downbeatplumb - June 24, 2017 at 2:56 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by The Grand Nudger - June 22, 2017 at 5:00 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Court Jester - June 22, 2017 at 5:01 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Minimalist - June 23, 2017 at 6:08 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Minimalist - June 23, 2017 at 7:16 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Court Jester - June 23, 2017 at 8:22 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Cecelia - June 24, 2017 at 2:07 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Mermaid - June 24, 2017 at 2:38 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Court Jester - June 24, 2017 at 2:50 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by Mermaid - June 24, 2017 at 2:56 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by CapnAwesome - June 24, 2017 at 4:51 pm
RE: Potential candidates in 2020 - by NuclearEnergy - June 24, 2017 at 5:04 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Kanye West 2020 President Raino921 40 3171 August 5, 2020 at 12:16 am
Last Post: Dundee
  JoJo 2020 onlinebiker 3 482 May 30, 2020 at 10:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  trump the republican asks communist china to investigate his potential election rival Anomalocaris 10 1447 October 4, 2019 at 10:18 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Andrew Yang 2020 EgoDeath 0 263 February 19, 2019 at 11:45 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Will Trump be Ambushed for 2020 Nomination? Yonadav 19 2899 January 22, 2019 at 7:56 pm
Last Post: Yonadav
  My predictions for 2019 & 2020. Jehanne 17 2550 November 13, 2018 at 10:51 am
Last Post: Joods
  Who do you want to be the Democratic nominee in 2020? CapnAwesome 71 6214 September 14, 2018 at 1:25 am
Last Post: Silver
  Should Hillary Run in 2020? John V 40 7413 July 19, 2018 at 11:22 am
Last Post: CapnAwesome
  You Were Stupid. Will You Still Be Stupid in 2020? Minimalist 39 6255 May 15, 2018 at 7:59 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Warren 2020 (First female US President) GrandizerII 23 5777 November 10, 2016 at 10:00 pm
Last Post: Sterben



Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)