I have pointed out numerous times that if a drunk driver makes it home safely they're no morally superior to a drunk driver with less fortunate circumstances. Whether or not someone has to have hit someone to be caught on a cell phone while driving, it's such a horrendously negligent, inhumanly uncaring thing to do that it's insulting for anything less than a prohibitively high fine to be imposed for doing it.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
