(June 26, 2017 at 7:46 pm)Minimalist Wrote: That's not exactly what the court ruled.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/26/us/po....html?_r=0
Quote:But those challenging the travel ban said the court’s opinion would protect the vast majority of people seeking to enter the United States to visit a relative, accept a job, attend a university or deliver a speech. The court said the travel ban could not be imposed on anyone who had “a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.”
Maybe the WLB will keep out a handful of tourists?
And he's already done a shitload of damage to that industry.
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/18-billi...ravel-ban/
Quote:In early June, the Los Angeles Times reported on an analysis from the website Foursquare that found tourism to the U.S. dropped six percent between October 2016 and March 2017, when it dropped even further to 16 percent.
According to the Foursquare report, Asian tourism is reaping what Trump has sown — Asia “has picked up leisure business at the expense of the U.S.,” meaning rather than just staying home, tourists are taking their money elsewhere in pursuit of travel.
Well, isn't that kind of the result of how he runs businesses? Did we expect him running a government to go any differently?
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
